|
|
|
Curriculum. Lesson plans. Scope and sequence. Schedule. School year. Learning objectives. What math curriculum is best for a kinesthetic-auditory learner? Which should my children learn first, Latin or a currently spoken language? What’s the difference between Beautiful Feet and Sonlight? What should my kindergartener be learning? How do I teach my daughter to read? When should I start teaching my six year old spelling? What algebra text is best? Must my son do biology before chemistry? Shouldn’t my daughter know how to write a persuasive essay by now? These are the words and questions that abound among
homeschoolers, both at online message boards and in homeschooling support groups
around the country. Daily I read several homeschooling message boards on the
Internet; daily I read these and a hundred other questions like them. Sometimes
I answer: I have opinions on curricula, when kids might best be exposed to what,
ways to think about our expectations for our children. Lately, though, I’ve
been questioning the wisdom of even entering into these conversations, except
perhaps as a cranky gadfly. What’s wrong with all this discussion of what must
be, after all, the nuts and bolts of homeschooling? Surely homeschoolers need to
think about what learning resources to use, when to use them, what are effective
approaches to teaching different kinds of learners. Surely it’s wise to pool
our collective wisdom and experience, to share our experiences with different
curricula, to point out the weaknesses in different approaches to homeschooling,
and to share the resources we’ve found most helpful—and those that stank.
Yet all this talk of books and lesson plans, classical homeschooling and unit
studies, Life in America and Alpha Omega, chronological history versus American
history first obscures the heart of homeschooling and runs the risk of
discouraging homeschoolers from pursuing what really counts in homeschooling: a
home life rich in love and lifelong learning. When new homeschoolers launch into homeschooling by way
of curriculum fairs, homeschool supply catalogs, and message boards or support
group meetings filled with talk of the schoolish aspects of homeschooling, they
believe the lie that homeschooling is of necessity about school. What else could
it be about? It’s about planning a schedule for the school day, choosing
between Writing Strands and Wordsmith, motivating seven year olds to sit still
for spelling time, discovering our eight year old’s learning style. But all of this misses the heart of homeschooling, for
homeschooling at its best is not about academics. We keep our children home so
we can continue to build rich relationships with them as they grow, so we can be
their staunchest allies and fiercest advocates, so we can be their models, and
so our examples can lay a foundation of spiritual and emotional health that will
last them a lifetime and into eternity. If that is what all good parents desire
for their children, even those who choose other educational options for them, it
is no less the heart of homeschooling. Many homeschooling parents truly enjoy the schoolish
parts of homeschooling. Many moms love the planning, the teaching tips, the
homeschooling jargon (LLATL or IEW? BJU or R & S? WTM or BF?). They thrill
to find that pristine used copy of the now out of print Kingfisher Illustrated
History of the World, delight in nabbing that Landmark book on EBay, and love to
share their top ten lists of Fiction for Boys Under Ten. They agonize over their
plans for the new school year with genuine relish for the task, zip around the
vendor hall at the annual convention with a furrowed brow and a happy heart.
Like any other hobby, playing school can be lots of fun. But what of the parents who dislike lesson plans and
who feel helpless in the face of the decisions that seem to be required? What
about those who despair of ever learning the lingo and ever getting a handle on
the subtle differences between Saxon and Horizons math? What about moms who
don’t enjoy teaching, who feel oppressed by rather than energized by the
offerings in homeschooling catalogs? Are they not cut out for homeschooling? Are
their children better off in school, under the tutelage of professionals who
know how to plan out a unit on amphibians, complete with field trips, hands-on
activities, and creative assessment projects? These parents may not be cut out for teaching school, but
they are likely eminently well qualified to learn alongside their children at
home, to support and encourage their young ones as they begin to make sense of
the world around them, the mysteries of the printed word, the wonders of
patterns and shapes and numbers. If they are willing to watch their children,
listen to their children, learn from their children, and share their own worlds
with their children, then they are not just adequate to the task of
homeschooling; they are more qualified than the fanciest teacher among us. No
child in a home with literate, caring, thoughtful adults will fail to be
prepared for life beyond home. No child in a home with books and magazines and
the welcoming lap of a reading adult will fail to learn to read, and nearly all
such children will learn to love reading. No child in a healthy home will fail
to learn all the arithmetic he or she needs to succeed as an adult. These skills are basic, so basic to life in our time
that they will be acquired by any healthy child whose parents are present and
paying attention. Fancy curricula, expert teaching advice, and flash cards are
not necessary. They may do no harm; they may help; but they’re not necessary. Beyond the basics, children will learn what they are drawn to
learn. If homeschooling parents are willing to put resources in the paths of our
children, enable them to visit libraries, support their explorations and
interests, our children will drink deeply of the sciences, history, art, music
and other fields according to their bents. If they never master the periodic
table of the elements, if geometry remains forever a blur to them, if the
five-paragraph essay befuddles them into adulthood, they will still be OK. But
if we as parents abandon our children in our efforts to track down the latest
and greatest in homeschooling curricula, if we are so pressured by our
homeschooling peers and those who would sell us homeschooling tools that we are
stressed and distressed, what lesson will our children really learn? That
learning is difficult and requires just the right approach? That I, the child,
am to blame for not catching on to grammar or fractions or spelling, and I am
driving Mom crazy? That the books matter more than the children? The heart of homeschooling isn’t in the details: long division, onomatopoeia, iambic pentameter, the fall of Rome, or mitosis. The heart of homeschooling is in the home we build for our children. Homes full of love for one another, love of learning, interest in and concern for the world will almost surely produce well-educated young people, regardless of the methods or materials we choose to use in our homeschool. Homeschooling is not about school; it’s about home. Copyright
2000 Laura D. Bush All rights reserved. |